I read your reply in its entirely, thanks for the shout out! While there are simply too many infelicities and flawed premises in your rejoinder to address in my limited time today, one of them really caught my attention. You cite John McCain, as a “conservative”??? Surely you jest.
But in spite of your penchant for stealing bases and skirting inconvenient truths, I still think you’re there’s hope for you yet- you’re capable of much better ‘incisive’ insights than that one.
Pingback: Lies, damned lies, and SharkTank.net : The Reid Report
A response:
http://blog.reidreport.com/2010/07/lies-damned-lies-and-sharktank-net/
Hello JReid-
I read your reply in its entirely, thanks for the shout out! While there are simply too many infelicities and flawed premises in your rejoinder to address in my limited time today, one of them really caught my attention. You cite John McCain, as a “conservative”??? Surely you jest.
But in spite of your penchant for stealing bases and skirting inconvenient truths, I still think you’re there’s hope for you yet- you’re capable of much better ‘incisive’ insights than that one.
xoxo
Lone Shark
I love the word “infelicities.” Adding it to my lexicon, and will be sure to give you credit.
Have a great day!
Thanks for the acknowledgement!
Talk to ya soon!