CPAC’s Sukhail Khan Questions Glenn Beck, Repudiates Muslim Brotherhood (VIDEO)
by Javier Manjarres
This past weekend I was able to catch up to the man who has been at the heart of the controversy at this year’s CPAC event in Washington D.C., Sukhail Khan. Khan has been accused of having ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, an organization with clear ties terrorism and Islamic Fundamentalism throughout Middle East. Khan condemns the actions and tactics David Horowitz and Frank Gaffney, to name a couple-even referring Horowitz as a former Communist. Khan goes on to repudiate the Muslim Brotherhood and any violence that they are presently espousing around the world.
Khan is also being accused of having ties terrorist Abduraham Alamoudi, currently serving a 20-year jail sentance for being an upstanding Islamic Jihadist.
Abdurahman Alamoudi, who is now serving twenty-three years in prison for financing jihad activity. In 2000, Alamoudi said at a rally, “I have been labeled by the media in New York to be a supporter of Hamas. Anybody support Hamas here?…Hear that, Bill Clinton? We are all supporters of Hamas. I wished they added that I am also a supporter of Hizballah.” Alamoudi was at that time head of the now defunct “moderate” group known as American Muslim Council (AMC), and was active in other Muslim groups in the U.S. that showed sympathy or support for jihadists. – Atlas Shrugs
6 Responses to CPAC’s Sukhail Khan Questions Glenn Beck, Repudiates Muslim Brotherhood (VIDEO)
Leave a Reply
The Shark Tank’s Social Media
Paid Advertisements
Islamic terrorists like this guy, Muslim Brotherhood, Obama, etc. will Lie and say anything to accomplish the spreading of Islamic facism and Shariah Law around the globe.
Why anyone would believe one word that these terrorists speak is unexplanable?? The Muslim Brotherhood has cells all over the US. They are an extreme Islamic Jihadist terrorist group. Obama suports these SOBs and their purpose is exactly the same.
The ends justifies whatever means they must use to spread the evil ideology of Islam. All infidels must be destroyed.
Sad, but it is just facts. It is insanity.
Radical Muslims want the destruction of our western way of life and implement in America their evil shariah law.
If anyone has ever read the Quaran they will realize that it plainly states a Muslim can lie, enter any sort of agreement, when it is in their best interest, then repudiate the agreement when it suits their purpose. It specifically mentions entering into agreement for ceasement of hostilities to give their armies time to regroup and rearm.
I have been a student of the Arab world since the 1950s when I spent 2.5 years in Libya. Their purpose has not changed in the last 1400 years, to conquet the world and impose Islam on everyone.
If you haven’t been studying their literature and their bible, you need to do so. The Muslims are not like most races or groups of people, their religion preaches radicalism and incitement of fear in the drive to achieve world domination..
My analysis -
Taqiyya (from Wikipedia)——
The practice of concealing one’s faith in dangerous circumstances originates in the Qur’an itself, which deems blameless those who disguise their beliefs in such cases.The practice of taqiyya in difficult circumstances is considered legitimate by Muslims of various persuasions. Sunni and Shi’i commentators alike observe that Q 16:106 in particular refers to the case of ‘Ammar b. Yasir, who was forced to renounce his beliefs under physical duress and torture.
Similarly, Q 3:28 enjoins believers not to take the company of doubters unless as a means of safeguarding themselves. “Let not the believers take those who deny the truth for their allies in preference to the believers – since he who does this cuts himself off from God in everything – unless it be to protect yourself against them in this way…”Regarding 3:28, Ibn Kathir, a prominent authority writes, “Whoever at any time or place fears their [infidels'] evil may protect himself through outward show.” As proof of this, he quotes Muhammad’s companion, al-Hassan, who said, “taqiyya is acceptable till the Day of Judgment [i.e., in perpetuity].”[citation needed]
This is jihad going for the jugular. Placing Khan to an organization at the heart of conservative movement in America is a way to dishearten, weaken and demoralize the conservatives. This appears to be a trial run. If his attacks on Gaffney and Horowitz go unanswered they will infiltrate in greater numbers.
Clue # 1 : Watch his expressions change to where it becomes obvious that he is having to force himself when asked about repudiating “muslim brotherhood”.
Clue # 2 : His answer to a direct question about repudiating “muslim brotherhood” starts with “I am a Reagan Republican……….”
Clue # 3 : Continuously repeats his rhetoric about “Serving the country……”. He worked for the government when Bush administration wanted to be fair and recruited muslims. He has not done anything of significance for the country……
And the list of Clues goes on….but most importantly. If he succeeds, we are all in big trouble, especially if he gets away with attacking Gaffney and Horowitz.
No Muslim Brotherhood cells in America? Then who are those impostors on our college campuses claiming to be MB members and MB advocates?
Sure is nice have one honest Muslim in a vast sea of liars.
Noooo No Muslim Brotherhood in America. David Horowitz a “former communist” is Khan’s smear on the most insightful author on radical islam and the american left. I read Horowitz’s book “Unholy Alliance, and I’m with Horowitz and see the smear attempt for what it is: muslim propaganda.