You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “2012 Republican Presidential Poll- BONUS- Special Poll Question for Ron Paul Supporters”.
2012 Republican Presidential Poll- BONUS- Special Poll Question for Ron Paul Supporters
June 22, 2011
21 Responses to “2012 Republican Presidential Poll- BONUS- Special Poll Question for Ron Paul Supporters”
Man Javi, your really going to piss off the Paul bearers with this one, good stuff.
Sorry but the GOP suck I was checking out their stock portfolios they work for big oil and big banks not us.
If anything other than Typical Media Blather, indicates defeat. Lets see how well we do for the Ron Paul Campaign… First. If we don’t succeed, then we have not given enough effort to ensure Liberty will survive in America. Now I have a question for you.
IF a FOUNDING FATHER ran for President today, would you VOTE for him? Who most closely follows the Constitution and our Founding Fathers, RON PAUL 2012
Can you support FREEDOM or do you need or rely on the TYRANT of your choosing? Do you have to control others, their beliefs, life styles or steal their labor, diluting the Freedoms and Liberties of others (man, woman, child or Sovereign Nation) while you enjoy your own at their expense?
Not cool, Javi. That seems very unprofessional of you. Why don’t you engage us (Paul supporters) in a meaningful conversation/dialogue/debate about issues that you clearly have with us (or our platform) instead of this bitter, passive-aggressive poll aimed only to insult us.
I thought you were better than that, Mr. Manjarres
Sincerely,
-Mr. Gonzalez
I would vote for Rand Paul, Jim DeMint, Allen West, Sara Palin,and unfortunately in 2012 I will only be voting Against Obummer. Just hope we can slow the Socialist Train down some.
Ron Paul is the only candidate who has promised to conduct his presidency in a constitutionally limited manner. He is the only candidate who is offering solutions based on the constitution of the Framers and Ratifiers ( including the all important state conventions.)
None of the others have spoken out against what is a de facto plenary executive today other than of course, they don’t like the way the current president is using that plenary power.
If one feels the constitution is electable, one will vote for Dr. Paul. If one prefers the living constitution of the two major parties, then they will vote for their favorite party statist. It isnt even a matter of calling each other names, such as is popular against Dr. Paul; it is a matter of whether America wants a return to its original liberty tradition or the illusion of freedom sold as liberty today by the statist quo.
Dr.Paul has if nothing else, raised the bar of the conversation by getting the others to speak about gold and even that great international globalist Newt Gingrich has tried to posture as an opponent of the FED.
Personally, I believe the Constitution is electable.
This is the most biased bunch of foolishness I have seen yet directed at the most honorable Ron Paul. I will be taking my name off this E-mail list and gather my news from a more mature and fair source
People, people…let us not ‘fuss’ at each other. We, I am sure each have our ‘favorite’ candidate. The ONE thing we all have in common…IS DEFEAT OBAMA and his Gang!
We will ALL be working hard for our candidate…but we must remember when It comes right down to WHO will win the nomination…we MUST ALL suck it up and get behind the man or woman who will be running to DEFEAT OBAMA.
Let us not forget …UNITED WE WIN…DIVIDED WE LOSE!
Let us all WORK TOGETHER AS A TEAM and bring an end to the Liberal/Socialist/Marx in the White Hut in D.C.
Best regards folks..Let’s go get ‘em!
Methinks Ron Paul’s supporters are way too sensitive! I don’t see any mockery of Paul in this poll- it’s simply a realization that Paul’s supporters tend to mobilize and flood polls far more effectively than other candidates which skewers the polls that he’s a part of. And please, if there are indeed any realistic Ron Paul supporters out there, they must understand that their guy has zero chance of winning the primary. Do you guys want to get rolled by Obama or do you want to turn the tide against socialism and start electing more conservatives and libertarians that are Republicans?
Conservatives think Paul has much to offer when it comes to the Fed, Monetary Policy, and limited government. We also think he’s a complete buffoon when it comes to foreign policy and “non-interventionism”, which is why he is just as misguided as Obama is domestically. If Paul were President instead of Reagan during the last years of the Cold War, could you imagine the calamity that would have ensued around the world if we had actually implemented a “non-interventionist” foreign policy, withdrew our forward positions and ceded the Western front to Communism??? That’s what “non-interventionism” would have reaped. Thanks, but no thanks.
How in the world would we turn the tide against socialism by voting a Republican lite socialists like Mitt, Newt or Rick?
Remember when the Republicans were in charge last time?
They doubled the size of the federal government.
It was the Republicans who shredded the Constitution with the Patriot act. A law that even Allen west no longer supports.
It was the Republicans who started the bailout.
It was a candidate in the Republican presidential primary who instituted an individual mandate on healthcare in his state.
It is another Republican presidential candidate who supported cap and trade. How are you guys much different than the Democrats.
It was a Republican president who said he had to abandon free market principles to save the free market.
The Paul Ryan plan will INCREASE federal spending, add over 5 trillion to the national debt in 10 years and not balance the budget for 50 years.
It is the current Republicans in the House that rejected a plan to balance the budget in 10 years.
It was the GOP who started the TSA and DHS
Took over the schools with no child left behind
Bribed the churches with the faith based initiative
Sent out stimulus checks every year like drunken sailors
Continued to fund the sovereignty-taking United Nations
Continues to let the Federal Reserve go unaudited
Initiated the socialistic prescription drug benefit
I will vote for a Constitutional Conservative (Libertarian) and will not vote for the lesser of two evils ever again. We already know that the Republicans cannot be trusted to restore the Republic.
Can I write-in “Buddy Roemer” since you didn’t include him in the poll?
The reason Javier set this poll without Ron Paul is because his looney supporters stack every poll you can to make it appear as if Paul has much more support than he really does.
So it’s unprofessional what Javi did but it’s all good that you idiots vote 50 times in a poll to skew it so no one can really gauge who the real front runners are.
You Paul supporters need to get a life and enjoy the 9% primary vote RP will get.
Where is Sarah Palin at Sharkie?
I notice you also excluded Gary Johnson from your candidate list. I’d vote for him if you’re going to exclude Rep. Paul but wouldn’t cast a ballot for the remainder of big-government loving candidates that are currently in the running. You all can sit back and pick your next dictator but don’t count on the support of those of us that have actually studied the history behind the “Great Experiment” our ancestors knew as the United States of America, a federation of republics that has long been usurped by the Fabian Socialists disguised as the “preferred” candidates in both of the “major” parties.
Javier, apparently you have let your real character slip out. May be you are frustrated that your butt is being kicked by the folks at the BizPAC Review.
I speak to Republicans in the real world, those that have no use for party insider politics. They have no use for the list of mulit-flavored cookie cutter, establishment beholden clones in your list. In case you haven’t noticed, Rand Paul, Ron’s son, is sky high the estimation Fran Luntz focus group.
Also, why is it that most of those who have left comments are extremely well informed on the kinds of things that matter to people who are looking for a good candidate to vote for in 2012. Maybe they reflect the real reasons why Ron Paul won your UNSCIENTIFIC poll. Of everyone should know that most unscientific polls these days use software that prevents people from voting more than once. Don’t you also?
Is it possible that ‘El Sharkbo’ is highly biased to the candidates that buy advertising space on his website? Is that what it would take to get Ron Paul back on the list?
How can you claim that Ron Paul supporters voted multiple times in your poll? Where’s your proof?
If you took this road to the bottom because of outside pressure, which seems highly likely, then shame on you.
Why did you delist the former governor of New Mexico Gary Johnson? He appears to have as much support as the other governors you list (that is, very little so far) and was very successful in his state in cutting spending, even with a Democratic legislature. In policy terms, he is certainly more credible than a Pawlenty.
Are you going to keep reducing choices in your polls until your favorite wins? What is the point of that?
-pb
Good show Andrew Nappi it is not very often I come across someone as informed as you. Are there any more like us out there? Are the just staying below the radar? Let’s hope the convert those around and get out and vote.
Why isn’t Sarah Palin on the list? She ranks first or second on most polls and has the highest Republican favorability rating of anyone in the field, yet you apparently conclude that she’s not worthy of being listed in your little survey? Rick Perry is listed, but he hasn’t declared either, but you leave off Paul and Johnson too?!
For the reasons listed above, this “poll” is worthless cbiased garbage, and not worth my vote.
Re: Sean & Phillip..
I attended a Strong America Now event in Iowa recently.
Gov. Gary Johnson was one of the speakers there. He was really coming across very well and I and many others were impressed…but near the very end of his time…he BLEW IT.
He said two things…#1…he is for legalizing drugs…not just pot..but others. The people in the audience were shocked.
I was one of them. I couldn’t believe when he was really doing so well and he ended with that! The 2nd thing I can’t recall. I was disappointed. Steve King from Iowa also spoke…and HE DID AN EXCELLENT JOB..If HE were to run I would vote for him and Michele Bachmann. That would be a team! Best regards folks.
If I may please;
American speaking to American, please I beg, look into Mr. Ron Paul’s issues and why he takes, as he always has, the positions he does.
Mr. Ron Paul’s 2012 platform creates jobs!
Strengthened dollar means increase in literal productivity do to the attractiveness of having “trust redeemable at any bank in the USA.” An increase in purchasing power due to a re-regulation of gold to back our paper dollar, would cancel inflation almost immediately.
Lower fuel prices, lower food prices, lower retail prices + strengthen dollar = more spending power per dollar!
That “more spending power” goes right back into the economy!
Imagine how the above could help Your Family in the next 4 years?
Imagine how the above could help Your Country in the next 4 years?
Regan said, “what to ask is am I better off now than 4 years ago. Is food cheaper now than 4 years ago? Are taxes lower now than 4 years ago?”
With Mr. Ron Paul’s 2012 platform, You, it and they will be.
Please please please, give a serious look into what Mr. Paul’s platform represents.
Long ago JFK called for the Nation to come together to touch the moon. 50 years ago exactly, we struggle to maintain even something as simple as a budget. Time for a non-bipartisan change please.
Constitutionally, legislatively, and morally, Ron Paul has no equal. His 22 year voting record speaks for itself.
Please help give America back Her Constitution.
Ron Paul for President in 2012.
Thank You
Mike McCalister check him out. he is america he is truth he is running for senate in florida. I heard his speech and it was not a speech running for the senate it was a speech from a great leader of a great nation. he is for the constitution, he spoke out about what is happening now and he laid out a detailed plan. A very detailed plan for america. He is my choice for the next President of the United States. check him out. listen to his speech. if you think and feel what I did then write to him and tell him so. He is not running for the presidency. but he should run. There is not a single person currently running that is going to beat the current regime. Its a sad but true fact. I urge you to check out Mike McCalister watch his speech at the national convention that was held june 18th. I have not felt hope like this in a long long time. sure ron Paul is for the constitution but sadly he will not win. but after listening and watching Mike Mccalister there was a hope I have not felt in over ten years. check him out. he could be the next president of the united states. do we want to take our country back? or do we just want to hope we can? I am telling you check out retired colonel Mike McCalister.