by Javier Manjarres
President Obama’s violation of the War Powers act of 1973 by not obtaining Congressional approval within 90 days of his authorization of military action in Libya has divided Republican members of Congress and has damaged the unified front that Republicans had displayed towards the Obama administration subsequent to their 2010 election night landslide victory.
Last week, Florida Senator Marco Rubio penned an Op-Ed with fellow Senator Joe Lieberman (I), and sided with ‘moderate’ Republican John McCain in support of the Obama war strategy in Libya. Rubio has received tremendous backlash from constituents for not siding with other members of Congress, including fellow Florida Republican Congressmen Allen West and Steve Southerland, as they both demanded that the President seek Congressional approval before continuing military operations in Libya.
“When the President ignores the People’s House, the President ignores the people,” said Southerland. “Congress has a constitutional obligation to end our unauthorized and fiscally irresponsible mission in Libya without delay and without exception. I am pleased that members of both parties joined me in reaffirming Congress’s constitutional responsibility to authorize war operations by rejecting continued action in Libya. In an overwhelmingly bipartisan voice, Congress sent a message to the Obama Administration that its willful disregard for the Constitution and our burgeoning fiscal crisis will not stand.” -Congressman Steve Southerland
U.S. Senate candidates Col. Mike McCalister and FL Senate President Mike Haridopolos, also weighed in on the controversial and divisive issue and have sided with the Congressmen in opposing further military action without Congressional approval.
The President should have sought Congressional approval before the mission, and after breaking with that precedent, should seek approval for the continued engagement in the war, especially in light of the recent vote in the US House “-Mike Haridopolos
Congress can’t seem to make up its mind as to what position it should take vis-a-vis the President’s highly questionable actions, and the Senate is proving to be just as confused- a quagmire if you will that in all probability was anticipated by President Obama. With the lack of a definitive stance on the issue emanating from Congress, it’s safe to say that President Obama will continue to thumb his nose at Americans as well as make it much more likely that future military incursions overseas will occur that do not have the country’s genuine interests at hand.
2 Responses to “Republicans Divided on Continued Military Action in Libya”
Progressives in Action! The War Powers Act was a Dimicrat Law to control Repub Presidents( It Doesn’t apply to Dimicrat Presidents)
The Law came into being because the Constitution gave ALL the power to declare War to Congress and it wasn’t used anymore (since1941)by either progressive party.
So now cometh the Obama and he ignores not only the passe Constitution but the law too; and we “progress” towards Executive Rule.
Sort of like Clinton’s “radical” “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” Executive Directive for the military,is now outmoded and we “progress” to “Show and Tell” homosexual military. Both Parties agreed it was “reasonable”.
Now “everything” depends on who is elected as El Presidente because Congress has voted for it’s irrelevance by avoiding hard decisions and passing the buck. Checks&Balances, States Rights, Rule of Law,……… most younger “citizens” never even heard of these concepts……..Government Schools,Socialist Unions….= Current Politicians.
Mr. Obama has made the House and the Senate irrelevant by his use of Presidential Executive Orders. Now he has made them a laughing stock by willfully ignoring them and starting a war on his own. Sen. Rubio chose the wrong person to side with on this issue, a Rhino like McCain is no poster child for conservatism or the conservative Republican Party. With any luck McCain will be replace with a true conservative his next election. In the mean time I hope Sen. Rubio uses better judgement in the future.