You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “Pro-Life Republicans May Decide Florida’s Republican Senate Primary”.
Pro-Life Republicans May Decide Florida’s Republican Senate Primary
May 7, 2012
11 Responses to “Pro-Life Republicans May Decide Florida’s Republican Senate Primary”
You could put Godzilla on the ballot as a “pro-life” candidate and these folks would vote for him.
Candidate Marielena Stuart for US Senate of Florida is the only pro-life, pro family, pro constitutional candidate in the US Senate race.
I would like to see the lame stream media interview her. The media seems to center their attention on Rubio and others like Mack , cronies of the GOP . Rubio as Speaker, has put in socialists like Harvey Ruvin co-chair of ICLEI in position in Miami and dept of Climate and Environment and since Rubio has been Senator, signed the NDAA , raise the debt limit, the Patriot Act and is doing damage with his friends of illegals creating and standing with actions jeopardizing the sovereignty and safety of Americans .
Stuart on the other hand has shown her passion for life, family and unalienable rights through Actions, that’s right, ACTIONS.
I challenge the media to put her out there. http://www.stuart2012.com
God save the Republic.
I have heard Marielena Stuart speak at our Tea Party meeting. She is impressive; seems real; and thoroughly understands the Agenda 21 communism spreading in our local cities and governments.
She has lived under communism; recognizes its advances here in the US under the guises of Liberalism, Fairness, Green & EPA agendas. She would be a fighter we could use in the Senate.
http://marielenastuartforussenate2012.com/
Javier this piece is editorialized and uncharacteristic of your journalistic integrity.
You forgot to mention, or omitted in your description about Mack IV’s vote, that in Embryonic stem cell ressearch viable h-u-m-a-n-s are being killed with taxpayer monies; this is what Connie Mack IV voted for 4 times.
Pres. George Bush had only 2 vetos in 8 years, both for this morally indefensible procedure. You also did not inform your readers that ESCR has never worked, so his quote is either ignorant or deliberately misleading.
These are not some nebulous group of “cells.” It is an innocent human being. Killing is killing, and is a violation of the 5th Commandment, so there is no way Mack IV is 100% “pro-life.” This procdure is worsethan abortion because of the volume of human embryos created out side the Natural law and srored in fertility clinics.
Furthermore, his position in diametrically opposed to the teaching of the Catholic Church, which Mack lists he is on his web site. The Catechism of the Catholic Church says that those who assist, procure or advance the destruction of killing a human embryos/life is a grave moral evil, and in doing so automatically excommunicates themselves.
Thank you Mr. Manjarres for pointing out this crucial behind-the-scenes “hidden issue” driving Florida and National Republican politics. As a former Evangelical United Methodist clergyman (M.Div. and Th.M. from Duke University, 3 years of Ph.D. studies in Moral Theology at the University of Notre Dame) for the past 15 years I have been a growing national leader concerning such Pro-Life issues. From working with Rev. Paul Stallsworth (Head of LifeWatch U. Methodist Caucus) in the late 1990′s through taking a historic stand against Notre Dame’s embracing of dissident views (which culminated in the arrest of Alan Keyes during the Barack Obama 2009 Notre Dame commencement speech) I have been quietly working with Pro-Life leaders to insure that the shenanigans of the Charlie Crist flip-floppers on Pro-Life issues will receive a just rendering at the ballot box. First, I threw quite active support behind FL Governor Rick Scott in 2010 (after the McCollum campaign refused to even provide a Pro-Life statement; and this after having been approached about being part of Educators for McCollum Caucus). Second, I threw support behind Tampa Bay Pro-Life State House candidates, Larry Ahern and Jeff Brandes. Third, early on I had been approached by the Mitt Romney campaign to provide an endorsement (i.e. since I am an At Large Director for FL Right to Life), and in November 2011, after reviewing key statements to include Governor Romney’s historic veto of embryonic stem-cell research I endorsed Gov. Romney as the best option for promoting a Pro-Life Republican White House agenda that could solidify further Pro-Life judicial gains against the onslaught of Barack Obama’s Anti-Life policies. Finally, concerning the U.S. Senate race I cannot fully support either G.O.P. candidate for the reasons you rightly mention above. However, given the endorsement of Rep. Ahern, a leading Pro-Life presence in the FL House, and given Connie Mack’s vote to experiment on conceived human beings (truly SICK in my opinion!!) then the nod goes to Senator LeMieux. From here on out, whether it’s in Florida or nationally my tentative goal is to seek conversion where possible (e.g. State Senator Jack Latvala actually voted Pro-Life this past session; I wish he was as conservative as his son!!), and where no conversion is seemingly possible (e.g. Connie Mack’s obfuscation in seeking to justify scientific experimentation on conceived human beings thereby killing babies) then limiting influence at worst and defeating Anti-Life R.I.N.O.’s such as Mack during the primaries at best will be what I’ll be focusing on for the next several decades (I am only 40 years old, a former I-AA college football player in excellent shape, and so at least 3 – 4 more decades I plan to do this type of networking to insure 100% Pro-Life Republicans will only gain office, e.g. my votes for Scott, Rubio, et al in 2010).
Thank you Sharktank for publishing another article supporting MARIELENA STUART for the U.S. Senate. http://www.STUART2012.com She is the candidate who represents the “core beliefs and values” of the Republican grassroots conservatives. She is unabashedly and consistently pro-life unlike the other two candidates, Mack and LeMieux.
MARIELENA FOUGHT and PREVAILED against a massive multimillion dollar taxpayer bailout of a lab involved in the world of human embryonic stem cell research which proposed a move to Florida at the taxpayers expense.
MARIELENA STUART is the only authentic pro-life candidate in this race. She has dedicated much of her life to the defense of the unborn and the protection of the family. Join MARIELENA STUART wwwSTUART2012.com in this critical fight.
Being a Hispanic woman, baptised a Catholic, and consider myself a born again Christian, cannot vote for another Democrat who has funded and voted for anti-life legislation. 2012 elections will be the test for us all and we must vote for the Republican candidates that will mend our nation and it’s economy. Every Democrat running across this nation, is not fit to hold office as they stand for collectivism and re-distribution of our incomes and pensions. Power must be given back to the people and the states and the current Democtatic Party is fighting hard for a Cental Government that dictates what THEY think is best. Are we stupid or what? Always be on the side of life.
Comrades, You have two wonderful choices in your primary. What is the matter? You may choose RINO A or RINO B; What is so difficult?
While other states like Utah and Indiana are unseating incumbent Old RINO’s; We in Florida are a Do Nothing, See Nothing, Say Nothing,and consequently ignored grassroots.
I repeat, reiterate,and regret the wall of silence for Marielena Stuart.
“A people deserve the government they get.”
stuart2012.com
This is the best candidates the GOP can field? If so, it’s a sad day for constitutional conservatives! Same can be said for the presidential race! Can you say R-I-N-O?
Lemiuex lives 8 blocks from me. RINO. Mack is my former state rep. Moved to the west coast of FLORIDA. RINO. Wish Jeff Atwater was running. These 2 are losers!
While I’ve completely lost faith in almost all politicians, I haven’t lost it in my Maker. I’ll NEVER support a pro choice anything (life or union) and my vote will be in accordance with what the ultimate lawmaker, God, has said about it.