You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “U.S. Senator Rand Paul Endorses Connie Mack”.
U.S. Senator Rand Paul Endorses Connie Mack
May 9, 2012
Related Posts
Obamacare Donor-Gate Scandal Looming Over White...
Tweet
0 comments
Obama’s Scandals Give Rubio Reprieve On...
Tweet
0 comments
Obama’s “Failure of Leadership” and “Breach...
Tweet
0 comments
Comments
17 Responses to “U.S. Senator Rand Paul Endorses Connie Mack”
Looks like RINO B gets the nod over RINO A. I will vote for Marielena Stuart in the primary.
General Buddy, don’t you get it?
They’ve all sold out to the corporate elitists and wealthiest Americans and don’t give two hoots about you and your causes.
Yes I get it Comrade Rich. And your Obamanation is better how? Misery spread equally?
I like Marielena a lot but her pro-Palestinian sympathy,is a deal breaker!
I understnd that the Arab Israeli’s(palestinians)have serious issues but they are NOT caused by Israel,& they are being used as pawns by the Arabs.
God PROMISES to Bless those who bless Israel,& curse those who curse Israel,so that’s a bottom line for me& should be for our country too.
Trisha, what are you talking about? What campaign are you working for? MARIELENA STUART’s SUPPORT for ISRAEL is without question, as anyone who’s heard her speak will attest. Read the following article written by Marielena Stuart where she SUPPORTS ISRAEL and DENOUNCES the Palestinian Authority:
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/marielena/110525
My respect for Senator Paul has dropped substantially.
Anyone but Mack!
You’ll did not get the message ? The GOP is over. I guess it has something t do with Obama’s Czars who were Romney Aids ? Or maybe the 2010 Pledge To America the GOP made and has not fulfilled one (that’s 1)point,and yet aint reminding us of their victories ? Connie Mack ? What does that noise mean ?
Once again why the Tea Party per se (at least not the “bought out” kind) does NOT represent the interests of either Pro-Life Evangelicalism or Vatican-supporting Pro-Life Roman Catholicism.
“less taxing, less spending, less government and more freedom.” –Rand Paul.
“render unto Caesar” –Jesus
What about his vote supporting destruction of conceived human beings for scientific experimentation (embryonic stem-cell), Rand? Oh, but wait, lack of Pro-Life convictions IS consistent with the Ron Paul-Libertarian rogue element within Republican politics. <.
Please tell me, sir. If stem cell research produced a cure for a fatal disease that was afflicting you or a loved one, would you turn that cure down?
Rich no one with integrity would kill an innocent human life to save their own, the end never not justifies the means.
And the truth about embryonic stem cell research is that it has never had one success or cure, none, zip, zero. Adult stem cells have had numerous successes and cures and they do not kill innocent human life. So why doesn’t Mack advocate for what actually works and is not morally reprehensible?
Pres. George W. Bush had only 2 vetos in 8 years. Both of them were against embryonic stem cell research. What does that tell you?
Who do you believe “W” who does his homework or Connie Mack IV?
If derived from stem cells that necessitated the killing of a human embryo, then yes, I would turn down any such treatment. If, however, the stem cells were derived from adult cells that involved no abortion of a conceived human being, then yes, according to Catholic teaching, that is morally licit. There’s a great relatively recent statement on such medical technology that the Vatican put out in 2008. I have used it in teaching Barry University undergraduates in my PHI 370: Contemporary Moral Problems course.
Rich, as a member of the superior intellectual elite. You must have heard of Bone Marrow Stem Cell Research being more effective than Embryonic Stem Cells.
So it must be you favor Embryonic Abortion over Effectiveness.
Most Socialists Do, it’s that government welding death camps thing they are so attracted to.
Where do you all stand on Col. Mike McCalister? I’ve seen his bumper stickers, but just visited his website and was underwhelmed…still, got to be better than Mack.
If Rand Supports him, I’m confident Connie Mack is the best choice. Rand Paul has already proven himself to be a strong conservative and patriot for America with his voting record since coming into office.
Connie mack has done the same and can beat that double-talking tyrant Bill Nelson in November!
Rand Paul is nothing but a tool of the corporate elite disguised as a teabagger!!
Unfortunately I believe Paul has sold us out! Connie Mack IV is NOT like his dad and granddad were. He does not deserve his great namesake. The only one left now in the race for US Senate worthy of our vote is George Lemieux. People need to get to know him and what we are witnessing is the same old thing that the party does over and over, support someone with lots of money not the best person. Herman Cain endorsed Lemeiux, he found out the truth. Mack is married to congresswoman Mary Bono out of california. Tell me how that works?? He spends lots of time out there and not here in FL and because of that, he misses tons of votes!!
Garnering endorsements from top Tea Party leaders in the US Senate, Rand Paul, and US House, Michelle Bachmann certainly adds enormous credibility to fortify Connie Mack’s candidacy.
The race looks much better for the FL GOP to win.
Hopefully the Republican National Senatorial Committee will be re-evaluating their tepid enthusiam for prioritzing this contest.
Let’s win a 60-seat GOP US Senate this fall….